Johannesburg. The Group of 20 summit in South Africa is set to end Sunday with another diplomatic spat involving the United States after the host country refused to hand over the rotating presidency of the bloc to what it described as a junior US official.

The US boycotted the two-day meeting of leaders from rich and emerging economies in Johannesburg over the Trump administration's claims that South Africa is violently persecuting its Afrikaner white minority.

The US is due to take over as G20 president for 2026 -- and says it will host its summit at President Donald Trump's golf club in Doral, Florida. But South Africa insisted that a traditional handover ceremony at the end of this summit likely won't happen because the US only wanted to send a diplomatic official from its embassy, calling it an insult to South African President Cyril Ramaphosa.

“The United States is a member of the G20 and if they want to be represented, they can still send anyone at the right level,” South African Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola said. “It is the leaders’ summit. The right level is the head of state, a special envoy appointed by the president of that country, or it could also be a minister.”

South Africa said the handover would happen later, possibly at its foreign ministry building.

A Deepening Rift
It was not clear if any US officials would attend the closing day of the summit. The diplomatic rift between the US and South Africa deepened this week when Ramaphosa said the US had changed its mind and wanted to participate in the summit at the last minute. The White House denied that and said US officials would only attend the formal handover.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Ramaphosa was “running his mouth a little bit against the United States and the president of the United States.”

South Africa broke with tradition at the first G20 summit in Africa by issuing a leaders' declaration on the opening day of the talks on Saturday. Declarations usually come at the end of the summit.

That declaration came in the face of opposition from the US, which has been critical of a South African agenda for the group that largely focuses on climate change and global wealth inequality. Argentina said it also opposed the declaration after Argentinian President Javier Milei -- a Trump ally -- also skipped the summit.

Other G20 nations, including China, Russia, France, Germany, the UK, Japan and Canada, backed the declaration, which largely called for more global attention on issues that specifically affect poor countries, such as the need for financial help for their recovery efforts after climate-related disasters, finding ways to ease their debt levels and supporting their transition to green energy sources.

The G20 Is ‘Struggling’
South Africa championed the declaration as a victory for the summit and for international cooperation in the face of the Trump administration's “America First” foreign policy. However, G20 declarations are general agreements by member countries that aren't binding, and their long-term impact has been questioned.

Also, while the declaration included many of South Africa's priorities, some concrete proposals didn't make the final document. There was no mention of a new international panel on wealth inequality, similar to the United Nations-appointed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, that South Africa and others had called for.

Some questioned the G20's effectiveness in solving the most prominent global crises, like the Russia-Ukraine war and tensions in the Middle East.

The 122-point G20 declaration made just one reference to Ukraine in a general call for an end to global conflicts and the summit appeared to have made no difference to the nearly four-year war, even as leaders or high-level delegations from all the major European nations, the European Union and Russia sat in the same room in Johannesburg.

“Meeting for the first time on the African continent marks an important milestone,” French President Emmanuel Macron said, but added the bloc was “struggling to have a common standard on geopolitical crises.”